6 Comments
User's avatar
William Lee's avatar

Oh, so more gaslighting? reporter doing stuff to stir the pot of poo....

Expand full comment
W. A. Samuel's avatar

What day, what section, and what page was this article printed in the WSJ ?? Guess I might have to search on line…… Waste of time, ?? TBD.

Expand full comment
Maria Dyson's avatar

So that's where the stench of 4-day-old-in-the-sun fish is coming from!! And boyo! Way to bury the lede, WSJ: "...WSJ has admitted to Karoline Leavitt that they do NOT have the letter."

Expand full comment
W. A. Samuel's avatar

My God !! Wiki says that Joe P. is indeed a Pulitzer Prize**-winning investigative journalist at the WSJ. I guess WSJ subscribers will have to be on the lookout for future drivel from this loon. Oh, how the mighty have fallen.

(** Sad to say, but the Pulitzer Prize for journalism no longer signifies great achievement.)

Expand full comment
W. A. Samuel's avatar

At Gomer Pyle used to say: “for shame, for shame….” Shame in this instance goes primarily to the WSJ. What where they (their reporters & editors) thinking ?? Very poor journalism at best; at worst Rupert Murdoch** needs to straighten his flagship newspaper out quickly. Some heads need to roll at WSJ if they continue to source and print junk like this. Regarding Joe P. ?? Like my grandmother used to say: “he needs to get his pearly-white bottom leather strapped until it’s blood red.” That would be a good start. Why would any reputable news organization use Joe P.’s material ??

(** While I’m not into conspiracies, I wonder if Murdoch or his surrogates at the WSJ are trying to get something new and “fresh” out to divert attention from the Epstein saga. Perhaps Murdoch is knee-deep in the Epstein affair himself ?? Perhaps…..)

Expand full comment