Dana Loesch's Chapter and Verse

Dana Loesch's Chapter and Verse

Share this post

Dana Loesch's Chapter and Verse
Dana Loesch's Chapter and Verse
Last Week In Legal: All the Appeals Edition

Last Week In Legal: All the Appeals Edition

Hunter's lawyers step on the proverbial rake, Trump appeals the fraud case, Bragg responds to Trump's hush money appeal, Jack Smith appeals Judge Cannon's ruling, and more.

Lorraine Yuriar's avatar
Lorraine Yuriar
Jul 29, 2024
∙ Paid
22

Share this post

Dana Loesch's Chapter and Verse
Dana Loesch's Chapter and Verse
Last Week In Legal: All the Appeals Edition
1
Share

Hunter Biden Legal Troubles

Tax Case

Judge Mark Scarsi has threatened to sanction Hunter’s defense team for false statements made in their filing to dismiss the case. Hunter’s lawyer, Mark Geragos, claimed in the motion that David Weiss did not bring the tax charges until he was appointed as a Special Prosecutor. Judge Scarsi responded by reminding the defense that he knew all about that failed plea deal, and that is evidence that Weiss tried to bring these charges before being appointed. He has given Biden’s team seven days to respond and that a failure to “file a timely and satisfactory response will result in sanctions.”


Business Fraud Case

Former President Trump has filed his appeal. In the motion, Trump’s legal team lays out seven reasons why the case should be overturned.

  1. Judge Engoron ignored Appeals Court rulings,

  2. Misapplied the law,

  3. The fine for “disgorgement” is baseless because there was no victim,

  4. The $464 million fine is unconstitutional because of the Excessive Fines and Due Processes clauses in both the NY and US Constitutions,

  5. Cause of Actions two through seven should be dismissed because there are no “necessary elements of underlying provisions,”

  6. There is no underlying violation of the law that was misapplied,

  7. Judge Engoron did not understand how property value works and used the wrong valuation metrics to claim the properties in question were worth well below the actual value.

LawTuber Robert Gouveia went through the filing on his channel. Considering AG Letitia James’s recent comments that her singular focus is to help Kamala Harris beat Trump, as well as her statements from her own candidacy, it is clear that this case is political in nature. The motion mentions the political nature of the case in passing but doesn’t get into it in depth, nor does it get into the Judge’s antics in and out of the courtroom.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Dana Loesch
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share